The recent approval of a polytechnic in Abuja, named after President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has ignited intense controversy and widespread public outrage. This development has brought to the forefront critical ethical questions, casting a spotlight on the troubling dynamics of leadership and governance in Nigeria.
The act of naming a national institution after oneself while still in office raises serious concerns about the priorities of governance. It suggests a self-serving agenda that undermines the principles of democracy and public accountability. At its core, it sends a troubling message: personal legacy is being prioritized over the collective progress of a nation. This decision disregards the millions of Nigerians in dire need of genuine, transformative leadership and underscores the systemic flaws that enable such decisions to flourish unchecked.
A Nation in Crisis: Misplaced Priorities
The timing of this decision could not be more concerning. Nigeria is currently grappling with a myriad of crises. From a faltering education system and decaying infrastructure to widespread economic hardship, the nation faces immense challenges that demand urgent attention. Public universities and polytechnics are underfunded, with the education sector frequently paralyzed by industrial strikes. Yet, instead of addressing these critical issues, resources and focus appear to be directed toward personal glorification.
President Tinubu’s decision to name a polytechnic after himself raises serious questions about governance priorities. At a time when the nation’s educational institutions are in desperate need of revitalization, creating a new institution bearing the president’s name seems tone-deaf to the struggles of ordinary Nigerians. The message it conveys is one of detachment and a lack of empathy for the plight of the people.
Ethical Concerns and Financial Transparency
This move also raises red flags regarding corruption and misuse of power. Critical questions need to be addressed: How are funds for this polytechnic being sourced? Are public resources being diverted to fulfill the president’s personal ambitions? Nigerians have the right to demand transparency and accountability in governance. It is imperative that the full details surrounding the financing and approval of this institution are disclosed to the public.
A Culture of Self-Immortalization
This incident reflects a deeper cultural problem within Nigeria’s political elite—a preoccupation with immortalizing themselves through projects, structures, and monuments while neglecting the needs of the citizens they were elected to serve. Leadership is meant to be about service, not self-promotion. Public officeholders should focus on policies that uplift the masses and address systemic issues, rather than erecting institutions as monuments to their own egos.
The legacy of a leader is not determined by the number of buildings or institutions named after them. Instead, it is defined by the tangible impact of their policies on the lives of the people. Imagine the difference it would make if the resources allocated for this polytechnic were invested in rehabilitating public universities, funding scholarships, or improving the welfare of students and lecturers.
The Need for Systemic Reform
The controversy surrounding Tinubu’s polytechnic underscores the urgent need for systemic reforms in Nigeria’s governance framework. Public officials should not have the power to name institutions after themselves while in office, as this constitutes a blatant conflict of interest. Mechanisms must be put in place to prevent such self-serving actions and to ensure that governance prioritizes the collective good over individual ambition.
This is why movements like #RevolutionNow remain profoundly relevant. They represent a clarion call for Nigerians to demand better leadership—leaders who place national interests above personal ambition and understand that their role is to serve the people, not to aggrandize themselves.
A Call to Action
The naming of this polytechnic after President Tinubu is more than a symbolic gesture; it is a stark reminder of the systemic issues that plague Nigeria’s governance. It highlights the ongoing struggle for accountability, justice, and transparency in leadership. Nigerians must remain vigilant, holding their leaders to the highest standards and advocating for a governance system that prioritizes the needs and aspirations of the people.
As the nation navigates these challenging times, it is crucial for citizens to stand united in demanding ethical leadership and transparent governance. The fight for accountability and justice is far from over, and it is only through collective action that meaningful change can be achieved.
0 Comments